![]() ![]() #1950x cinebench installComes with necessary cooling bracket in the processor and Torx wrench for socket install ![]() Paired with liquid cool Corsair H115i - temps are 30-40C stock clocking. AMD is back, baby, and doing things right as opposed to Intel. Overall Review: -Truly the comeback story of the decade in the tech world, specially for CPU manufacturers. Kinda fun to install - everything from unboxing the excellent packaging to the socket insertion system works perfectly, and adds to the experience and the fact Threadripper is the most exciting CPU launch in YEARS.Ĭons: -Not many good coolers out in the marked, other than the Noctua NA14 (I think that is the name, apologies if it wrong) and MY CHOICE of Enermax Liqtech TR4 360mm AIO. Upcoming NVME Raid support + current support for Raid configurations unrestricted, again unlike Intel ![]() #1950x cinebench full64PCIe lanes, full and unrestricted as opposed to Intel's mere 48 (even on their new pathetic 7980XE or 7860X CPUs) I used to encode 23min video files on the 6700K, and those would take upwards of 30+ minutes to complete. Breezes through my Handbrake encoding loads. It seems that whether your 1950x base score is 2800 or 3000, when OCed to 3.9 or 4.0 the usual score increase is around 400 points. Scores around 2800 on Cinebench at stock, OC to 3.9 at 1.225v it scored max 3292. Could cool even better, so your temps might be even better if you max your cooling. That is, with me having the 360mm fans NOT AT MAX, around 60-70%. Stock max temps were around 58-60C max, OC to 3.9 at 1.225v yields a max temperature of 75-76C on Prime95. I previously had a 6700K coming from a 7700K (weird, I know, but the 7700K's TIM was so bad I could not keep it cool even at stock). ![]() Pros: -Incredibly powerful CPU, this coming from someone who had never previously owned a high-end workstation CPU before. My next AMD workstation build will use the newer TR 2950x, but the 1950x still offers the bestĬpu performance for price, until the 2950x is available. Wish amd could improve the memory controller and reduce CPU-RAM latency to competitive levels. Was best cpu value when I bought it for $999, and is a muchīetter value now at the reduced MSRP $799. You can get the max out of it, unlike Intel xeons. Overall Review: This is the best deal for a workstation cpu relative to Xeons, and as an unlocked processor, On my intel workstations there is little performance On my system, the NUMA setting (memory interleave on) for some reason reduces CPU performance byĪbout 15%, while boosting RAM performance by 20%. Large 20% memory performance difference between NUMA and non-NUMA settings. RAM performance dependent on CPU intercommunication Stability in rendering, which is very sensitive to BIOS settings, In general, RAM performance lags intel similar products by about 30% Part of that could be that in reality 1050x is a dual cpu design. Handles streaming 4K/8K editing, no problem!Ĭons: The fabric design of Threadripper seems to have high memory latency. Less than 25% of the price and with a single socket board.ĬPU Benchmarks are similar to average i9-7960x for half the priceĪ beast at multithread, floating point computation as needed for scientific simulation With ECC memory, this well outperforms all dual xeon v4s except E5-2698/2699 at So you get more for your money than advertised. My CPU bench tests about 20% above the reported TRl 1950x averages at various benchmark sites and runs #1950x cinebench windows 10My CPU's idling temp ~40CĬPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X CPU Cooler: Cryorig H7 OS: Windows 10 Pro 圆4 (v.2004) MB: Asus ROG Strix X570-F (BIOS 2812 BETA) RAM: 32 GB G Skill Flare-X 3200 MHz CL14 (4X8GB) PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 750 80+ Gold GPU: Asus GTX 1060 Strix 6GB OCĭud CPU (silicon lottery lemon) - but temp were OK and cores are capable of 4.65GHz Asus MB BETA BIOS 3200MHz RAM vs 3600MHz RAM - but I was under the impression that impact was only slight, if any High ambient temp (27C) - CPU temp was still below 70C I have some background apps running (just antivirus and HWInfo)Īny insights would be appreciated.Pros: This is a super workhorse I run daily at 4.1GHz. During the benchmark runs, CPU temp did not exceed 70C (max 68.6C), but frequency only hovered at around 4.075GHz (though all 6 cores are able to achieve 4.65GHz max). I was wondering why my Multi-Core score was significantly below average. I have left all settings at default/stock (ie no Auto-OC or PBO etc) Single Core: 588 (consistent with others' benchmarks) Multi-Core: 4055 (about 10% worse than others' benchmarks) Due to my inexperience with the benchmarking software, I would like some insight/clarification of my Cinebench R20 results for my Ryzen 5 5600X: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |